On the eve of
American occupation, the Philippines were at the time in a stage of fighting
for independence and/or reforms. The Filipinos at that time were divided into
different motives: the elites only wanted reforms and had no clamor for real
independence, and later sided with the Americans first before obtaining
autonomy; on the other hand, the common Filipino masses wanted immediate
independence.
The book is viewed from a
Filipino perception, focused on how the Filipino elite’s reception and reaction
to the American rule, its policies and institutions during 1901-1913, which is
also called as the Taft Era or Taft Regime. This era earned its name because
William Howard Taft was its president from 1901-1903, the civil governor from
1901-1903, Secretary of War exercising general supervision over the
Philippines, and finally president of the United States from 1904-1908, sharing
with Congress the ultimate responsibility for the adoption of policy, and
carrying sole responsibilities for the implementation of that policy, from
1909-1913. (Page 2, Introduction)
If we come to
think of it keenly, it is true that the American colonial regime’s policy is
very different from the Spanish rule for these reasons: (1) because of the
spirit of American institutions themselves, and (2) because Philippine society
before the American impact was different from the societies upon which Spanish
powers imposed their rule.
CHAPTER 2
THE PHILIPPINES ON THE EVE OF THE
AMERICAN OCCUPATION
This chapter presents a summary
of the revolution, the propaganda movement in the Philippines.
It is very important to note that
Spain had been in continuous occupation of the Philippines since 1565, and the
Filipinos had been Hispanized according to the degree of their exposure to
Spanish institutions. Suffice it to say that the Philippine revolution was not
merely a movement to overthrow Spanish rule but was also a social movement
aimed at transforming the Philippine society. This means that the Philippine
Revolution was an instrument of institutional change.
A clear description on the eve of
the American occupation to the Philippines is essential for the study of the
Filipino reaction to American occupation.
During the Spanish regime in the
Philippines in the 16th century, the Philippines already had a
distinct form of political organization, the
barangay. It’s the political government based on kinship, varying in size
from 30 to 100 families, and governed hereditary datu. The Spanish regime didn’t destroy this political system, but
instead enhanced it and made it the basis of village government. As a matter of
fact, the datu became cabeza de barangay (village
headman) and served as the mediator between the Spanish political and religious
authorities and the local people.
Number of barangays constituted a
pueblo or town. In appearance, the
town government was in the hands of the Filipinos. In fact, the gobernadorcillo (petty governor) was a
Filipino chosen by an electoral board drawn from the principalia (body of
prominent or elite residents of the town). This consisted of active and
former cabezas de barangay and previous office holders. In short, Filipino
participation of the government stopped at the municipal or town level.
A group of towns formed a province,
which was under a civil-governor, who earlier carried the title of alcalde-mayor. Appointed by the
governor-general of the Philippines, the alcalde-mayor was only an agent of the
central government.
The formulation of laws for the
country was the prerogative of the Spanish government and their applicability
to the Philippines was determined by the gobernador
heneral.
POLITICAL
STRUCTURE OF THE PHILIPPINES AS A COLONY OF SPAIN
Pre-Spanish customary law and
procedure weren’t totally swept aside. However, Spanish legal procedures were
introduced. For example, toward the end of the Spanish occupation, a judicial
machinery was established: a territorial supreme court in Manila, two superior
courts in Cebu and Vigan, courts of first instance in each province including
Manila, and justices of the peace courts in each municipality.
Unlike today’s society, the
Church and the State during the Spanish regime in the country were united, that
is to say, there’s no separation between
the state and the church back then. In fact, the state provides financial
and other forms of support to the Catholic Church. In addition, the governor
general which acted as the Vice Royal Patron, meddled in church affairs and in
turn, church bureaucracy performed political functions at all levels of civil
administration. In fact, the ecclesiastical bureaucrats have been regarded as
the “real vital organs of the Philippine
government system” under Spain.
In my humble opinion, this may be
the reason why the Catholic Church today and even a few decades ago, still hold
opinions and other similar policies regarding issues and concerns concerning
the state. One big example was the influence of Cardinal Sin during the first
EDSA People Power Revolution. Indeed, the influence of the Church to the State
affairs is somehow evident.
The political system introduced
by Spanish authorities was perhaps appropriate and desirable for the first
century of Spanish rule in the Philippines, but in its continuance, it became
oppressive and repressive and this leads to the revolution.
The Roman Catholic Church is one
of the most important social institutions back then. An outstanding feature of
the church was the role played by the regular clergy—particularly the
Dominicans, Augustinians, Franciscans, Recollects, and Jesuits—in political
organization and activities.
There was an attempt to replace
friars with secular priests, also known as “secularization.” In the latter part
of the nineteenth century however, the church had already abandoned the policy
of secularization, in fact, a counter-secularization policy or despoliation was
applied. This may be instigated by the friars themselves. True to speak, the
Spanish government came to rely increasingly on the church organization
(specifically the friars) to govern the Filipinos as its own bureaucracy grow
more efficient and corrupt.
Aside from their political instigations, the
friars also played roles in economic force, owning huge areas of lands in the
Philippines. Most of these friars were the Dominicans, Augustinians, and
Recollects.
In the educational field, the
friars were also prominent. Parochial schools in which they established were
forerunners of public primary school system under Spain, established secondary
institutes, colleges and the University of Santo Tomas. They determined the
content of the curriculum and later supervised primary schools.
Social
Stratification
The Philippine
society during the Spanish regime actually consisted of the Chinese, the
Spanish, and the Filipinos. Peninsulares refers to European-born Spaniards;
Insulares refers to Philippine-born Spaniards; and the Spanish mestizos are
born to Spanish-Filipino parents. Rich merchants and plantation managers formed
a small middle class, and lower ranking government officials. In short, the
Spaniards and Spanish mestizos belonged to the upper stratum of Philippine
society as a whole because they are the colonial masters and enjoyed vast
economic and political power.
On
the other hand, the Filipino society had its own aristocracy, made up of the caciques and the more opulent and highly
educated ilustrados (ilustrados applied to highly educated and professional
Filipinos, belonging to the upper class because most of them were coming from
well-to-do families who can afford a university education in Manila and even
Europe). Caciques were the datus of the various barangays in the Philippines
who were tax-gatherers, administrators of justice in their localities, and the intermediaries
between their people and Spanish authorities.
Taxation
and Tariff Relations with Spain
There
were four main types of internal taxes:
1. The
cedulas, personales, or capitation tax
2. Documentary
stamp taxes
3. Urbana
tax, or tax on rentals of urban property
4. Industria
tax, consisting of commercial, corporation, occupation, professional and income
taxes.
There were no real estate or land
taxes (truly unfair because friars weren’t obliged to pay taxes). Thus, those
who were in their position to pay better taxes were exempted to pay the tax. In
the case of industria tax, commercial establishments in the same line of
business paid the same amount of tax, regardless of the volume of sales or net
profits.
THE
HERITAGE OF REVOLUTION
As
the Spaniards monopolized the political and ecclesiastical power over the
Philippines, the ilustrados’ clamor for greater political power and reformation
arose. Contrary to the Katipunan’s aim, the ilustrados doesn’t want complete
freedom from the Spanish regime, instead, they proposed to accomplish their
programs and aspirations within the framework of the Spanish regime: extension
of a more liberal regime (as assimilated by the ideals of Governor Carlos Maria
dela Torre) and government institutions, a more efficient, honest
administration, more and better schools, and “the speedy replacement of the
friars by the Filipino priests.”
Unfortunately
for the propagandists, the Spanish government remained impervious to their
demands and so they failed.
The
Katipuneros emerged and so the “revolt of the masses” began. The Philippine
Revolution passed through two phases: the first phase started in August 1896
and was terminated in December 1897 by the Pact of Biyak-na-Bato, and the
second phase started in the early months of 1898 and ended as an armed
resistance against the imposition of American sovereignty over the Philippines.
As
far as the Filipinos are concerned, the most important change was the
liberation of the country from Spain and the establishment of the Malolos
Republic of 1899.
In
the first phase of the revolution, the ilustrados didn’t support the movement.
However, it was different in the case of the second phase. Thanks to Admiral
George Dewey, the Filipinos had more arms and weapons for war. Ironically,
Spaniards themselves were responsible for providing more weapons. In fact, they
had paid P400,000 to General Aguinaldo in December 1897, and the money was used
to procure arms.
One
of the changes brought about by the revolution was the removal of the friars
from their positions of power. The revolutionary government treated friars
within their territories as prisoners of war (POW), and thus, the Revolutionary
Government was able to show their desire to keep the Filipino priests on its
side and to take over the friar lands.
The
revolutionary government also encouraged and assisted in the establishment of
the National Church, which was conceived by Apolinario Mabini as early as
October 1898.
On
October 23, 1899, 27 Filipino priests led by Father Gregorio Aglipay assembled
at Paniqui, Tarlac and adopted the constitution of the National Church. This
National Church was a direct precursor of the Philippine Independent Church.
One
important legacy of the revolution remains to be noted: the steps taken in the
field of education. The revolutionary government continued more or less the
same system of education in effect before the revolution, however, the role of
the Spanish friar was gone.
Filipino
Aspirations
The goals were
expressed in writings, constitutional programs, and their testimonies as
recorded by their American interlocutors. Filipino aspirations were concerned
primarily with individual freedoms, the relation of individuals in society to
their political institutions, the proper functions of government, the limits of
governmental authority in a free society.
These aspirations for independence had a decisive influence upon the
policy of the United States.
CHAPTER
3
THE
BIRTH OF AMERICAN POLICY TOWARD THE PHILIPPINES
The
outbreak of the Filipino-American War on February 4, 1899, was the immediate
Filipino response to the American decision to acquire the Philippines. It was
the response of the people desiring recognition as a nation. The direct
aftermath of this war was smoldering Filipino distrust of the Americans, and
thus, it became the objective of American policy to prevent such an eruption of
violence.
The
American decision to acquire the Philippines completely shattered the
Filipinos’ faith and confidence of the United States. Other actions that led
Filipinos to suspect the Americans were as follows: Dewey’s failure to attend
or send a representative to the proclamation of Philippine Independence on June
12, 1898, and the refusal of the American military commanders to address
General Emilio Aguinaldo as the President of the Revolutionary Government. But
most important of all, the Filipinos had been prevented from participating in
the “battle” of Manila on August 13, 1898.
President
William McKinley declared the benevolent
assimilation for the Philippines. He sent the First Philippine Commission
or the Schurmann Commission and instructed to determine what improvements in
the condition of the Filipinos and in the public order might be adopted, and
make recommendations for the “perfection of present administration.”
Filipinos
on the other hand, cared not for the benevolent assimilation because they
wanted to be left alone.
As
fighting went on, the United States now came out with more proclamations of
intentions, and so, the Hay Plan was
offered, with a Philippine government to consist
of a Governor-general appointed by the President; cabinet appointed by the
Governor-General; a general advisory council elected by the people; and the
governor-general to have absolute veto. Judiciary strong and independent,
principal judges to be chosen from natives or Americans, or both, having regard
for fitness.
The
Schurmann Commission recommended that the military government should be replaced
by one staffed with civilians. Part of their government for proposing the
change was that military rule was incompatible with the Filipinos’ desire for
local home rule.
The Second, of Taft, Philippine Commission was
instructed to establish civil municipal and provincial governments, and to
perform the legislative and some minor executive functions of the military
governor. Taft viewed that the vast majority of the Filipinos weren’t opposed
to the United States at all. He concluded that “Filipinos would welcome the
civil authorities.”
Thus,
a civil government was imposed to the Philippines through the able
recommendations by Elihu Root, and whose recommendations were the basis for the
“Spooner Amendment.” Root became the Civil Governor of the Philippines
effective July 4, 1901, and by July 4 the next year, he issued an order placing
the entire Philippines except the Moro provinces under the civil government.
The
replacement of the military government was an effort to reconcile Filipinos to
the American sovereignty as rapidly as possible.
The
constitutional basis of the Philippine policy of the United States during the
Taft Era (1901-1913) was laid down in the Philippine
Organic Act of July 1, 1902, otherwise known as the Philippine Bill.
The
Letter of Instructions to the Taft Commission has long been hailed as a
landmark in the history of tropical colonization as “a model of constructive
statesmanship,” “the most important single document in American colonial
history.”
Taft
also advocated for a Philippine Assembly, and so, the Philippine Bill, with the
provision for the Philippine Assembly, was passed by the House of
Representatives, but in the Senate, the Philippine Assembly was dropped. This
agitated the Filipinos as expressed in a letter by the then Civil Governor Luke
E. Wright. As a result, Taft wrote another letter to the War Secretary, Lodge.
Thus, the Philippine Bill eventually passed the Senate, but it contained the
stipulation that the Assembly could be organized—not in 1904, as the commission
recommended—but only 2 years following the publication of the census, and then
only if peace had reigned throughout the Philippines during two years. This assembly
did not materialize until 1907.
It’s
important to point out that Taft’s recommendation also included that the
Filipinos be represented in the House of Congress, and thus 2 resident
commissioners represented the Filipinos to the House of Congress although they
didn’t enjoy voting privileges.
The
grant of Filipino concessions as a means of ending Filipino opposition and
reconciling the Filipinos to the American rule was accompanied by the
far-reaching decision to secure the withdrawal of the friars from the
Philippines and to purchase their lands. So to speak, America’s anti-friar and
religious policy, was in a way as decisive as the political concessions in
tempering Filipino reaction to American annexation and in reconciling the
Filipinos to the Americans.
In
summary, the series of events that took place (in a Filipino perspective) were
a convincing proof to the Filipino elite that the United States meant to
convince the Filipinos that their aspirations would be realized within the
framework of American sovereignty.
CHAPTER
4
THE
FILIPINOS AND AMERICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS
The American
civilization made its greatest impact upon the Philippine institutions from
1901 to 1913.
The propaganda movement and the
Philippine Revolution had already started to change some features of Philippine
life before the advent of American rule. Exhausted as a result of war against
Spain and even more costly against the Americans, Filipinos were hardly in a
position to reject forcefully the American program for political, social, and
economic reconstruction of the country. The period 1901-1913 was the period
during which the United States exercised the strongest control over the policy,
administration, and public instruction in the Philippines.
American administrators during
this early period of American rule, as well as American teachers (Thomasites)
leading private groups and individuals, such as churches and missionaries, were
imbued with Americanizing mission that was certainly less conspicuous among the
personnel of the succeeding administration of Francis Burton Harrison. This “Americanizing” mission was buttressed by
a policy which didn’t consider the possibility of Philippine independence until
Filipinos had gone through a long period of apprenticeship in the methods of operating
a democratic and efficient government.
It is important to note that
American policy emphasized more than anything the political development of the
Philippines. This was due to several reasons:
1.
The political development of the
Philippines toward self-government was the most important aspiration of the
Filipinos, particularly the elites, whose cooperation was essential to the
success of American regime.
2.
It would have been highly inconsistent
with the American political tradition had the United States not announced that
the paramount aim of her policy was to prepare the Filipinos for
self-governance.
However, it must be pointed out
that the American annexation of the Philippines did not have the endorsement of
the entire American people. For some of
them, colonies didn’t constitute a real national interest, unlike the case of European
colonial powers. In order to disarm the critics of his policy, then President
McKinley had to enunciate a policy with the tutelage of the Filipinos at its
focal point.
Municipal elections took place
but the right to vote was only accorded to males who were at least 23 years
old, had held municipal offices before August 23, 1898, were literate in either
English or Spanish, and who either owned real property valued at two hundred
fifty dollars or at least paid an annual tax of fifteen dollars.
Although positions were accorded
to the Filipinos, it’s important to point out that they only had limited role
played in the provincial government, and thus, the lack of provincial autonomy.
Three important observations on
the system of local governments during the Taft Era:
1.
The political subdivisions, or
administrative units, that had existed under Spanish rule were retained;
Americans introduced nothing new.
2.
Americans had failed to remedy a
fundamental weakness of local governments of the Philippines that was a
carryover from Spanish times.
3.
The Filipino elite became the
immediate beneficiaries of the system of local governments.
The Philippine Assembly was
perhaps the most important single political novelty introduced by the United
States to the Philippines. It was the matrix from which real Philippine
autonomy evolved and helped the national leaders like Sergio Osmena and Quezon.
Because its members were from diverse backgrounds and parts of the Philippines,
in the halls of the Manila ayuntamiento, where Assembly’s sessions were held,
members of the Filipino elite came face to face to deliberate freely.
The 80 popularly elected members
of the Assembly were apportioned among the 34 regularly organized provinces in
1907 on the basis of population, but each province was entitled to at least one
assemblyman (diputado), regardless the size of its population. Under the
Philippine Bill, members of the assembly held office for two years, and was
later extended to four years by a law passed by the United States Congress on
February 5, 1911. The assembly held annual sessions which lasted for nine days
excluding Sundays and holidays. They conducted their proceedings on Spanish and
its journal was therefore kept in that language.
We can assume that only those who
belonged to the upper class, who had ample educational background or previous
experience, could hope to be elected to the Assembly. The Philippine Assembly,
whose members were elected by at most only 3 percent of the population could
hardly be considered truly representative.
The Americans retained basic
units of the Spanish judicial system in the Philippines: justices of the peace
courts, courts of first instance, and the Supreme Court. They introduced a new
type of court, the Court of Land Registration. It should also be noted that one
of the greatest concessions to reality was the adoption of Spanish as the
official language of the courts.
The Supreme Court of the
Philippines during the Military Regime was composed of 6 Filipinos including
the chief justice and 3 Americans. The Philippine Commission reorganized the
court reducing it to 7 and appointed 4 Americans and 3 Filipinos including the
Chief Justice.
CHAPTER
FIVE
THE
FILIPINOS AND AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL POLICIES AND INSTITUTIONS
Public
education is considered by the Americans second in importance only to the
political development of the Filipinos; as a matter of fact, it was regarded as
the handmaiden of political progress. They established public primary schools
in almost every Philippine barrio, intermediate schools in the principal
barrios or poblaciones of municipalities and at least one secondary school in
each province. In retrospect, the American education system is secular, not
religious.
The
Faribault Plan was adopted under Section 16 of the Educational Act, that reads,
“No teacher or other person shall teach or criticize the doctrines of any
Church, religious sect, or denomination, or shall attempt to influence the
pupils for or against any church or religious sect in any public school.”
English
was then introduced to public schools. It I in this light that most Filipinos
back then, especially the elites had English education. On February 27, 1908,
the Philippine Assembly passed the Bill No. 148, which provided that
instruction in the public primary, or elementary schools should be given in the
language or dialect of that province or region. But the Philippine Commission
unanimously rejected that bill on the basis that it proposed a drastic
alteration of the whole scheme of public instruction in the Philippines, and it
would create unnecessary confusion, waste, and others.
American
teachers were also rampant around the country. Like the rest of their fellow
countrymen, the Filipino teachers welcome the American teachers warmly. The
training of public school teachers was only part of the program to enable
Filipinos to acquire higher education and professional courses in English. More
far-reaching were:
1.
The pensionado program, or the sending
of government scholars to study in the United States
2. The
creation of the University of the Philippines.
CHAPTER 6
RELIGIOUS DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE
TAFT ERA
Strictly speaking, there was no
religious policy originally imposed by the Americans. However, conditions in
the Philippines at the time of the annexation forced the United States to adopt
what amounted to a religious policy. Thus, because of Filipino antipathy
towards the friars, both Schurmann and Taft Commissions were compelled to
recommend their expulsion from the Philippines.
American policy led directly to
the introduction of Protestantism
and contributed indirectly to the early success of the Aglipayan Movement. The rise of Aglipayanism compelled the United
States to step right in the middle of controversies involving ownership of
religious property.
The Iglesia Filipina Independiente (Philippine Independent Church), or Aglipayan Church (Schism or Movement)
emerged (started by Father Gregorio Aglipay y Labayan). It developed from the
resentment of Filipino clergy against the Spanish Government and the Catholic
Church for failing to carryout faithfully the secularization of the parishes,
i.e., to replace the regular clergy with the secular clergy as parish priests
of the church.
The
birth of the IFI was received with great enthusiasm by a substantial number of
Filipinos-the actual number of Aglipayans before 1907 was probably not far from
3,000,000; 1,500,000 in 1918; and a lower number of adherents in the following
years, mainly because the Supreme Court favored the Roman Catholic Church on
the disputed ownership of religious properties.
The
Spread of Protestantism
With
American rule, came Protestantism. In May 1899, the Presbyterians established
the first permanent Protestant mission in Iloilo, followed by the Methodists
and Baptists in 1900, United Brethren and Disciples of Christ, and
Episcopalians and many others.
After
18 years of evangelical works however, the Protestants only converted 124, 575
Filipinos or 1.3% of the total population. The small number of Protestant
adherents can be explained below, as pointed by Laubach:
1.
Violence, including murder and the
threat of violence against Protestant converts
2.
Ostracism of those who chose the new
faith, even by members of one’s family
3.
Obscrantism, by Spanish rulers
4.
Overbearing attitude of low-class
Americans in the provinces
5.
Attitude of Filipinos towards
independence
Islam
Under the American Rule
At
the time of the American occupation, there were about 150,000 Muslims and were
concentrated mostly in Sulu and southern and central Mindanao. Their basic political
institution was the clan or kinship group, which was governed by a datu. This
evolved to a more elaborate political organization—the sultanate—embracing
several clans, or barangays governed by a rajah or sultan.
Spanish
power in the Philippines was strongest in Luzon and Visayas and was least
effective and unpredictable in Sulu and Mindanao and such was the situation
with the Muslims on the eve of American occupation.
Like
elsewhere in the Philippines, a military government was at first established
over Mindanao and Sulu.
In
summary, we can conclude therefore that the impact of American institutions
upon Moro life during the Taft Era (1901-1913) must have been very slight.
CHAPTER 7
THE FILIPINOS AND AMERICAN
ECONOMIC POLICY
In this chapter, we gain the idea
that American economic policy in the Philippines is characterized by
introducing American methods of free enterprise and business, enacting
legislation thought to be conducive to such development, and instituting
certain practices such as homesteads and Torrens titles.
Tariff
Policy
It is very important to note that
the United States acquired the Philippines mainly in the interest of trade expansion, and its tariff policy was shaped
accordingly. Because of the decision of the Supreme Court by declaring that
Congress had the power to incorporate or not to incorporate Philippines and
Puerto Rico within the American tariff wall; it gave an advantage to the United
States to frame a tariff policy in the Philippine government. The Filipino
elite did not favor the free trade relations; Salamanca in this book then
elaborated the reasons:
1.
It would be extremely adverse to the
economic interest of the Filipino People
2.
Free trade would delay the attainment
of Philippine independence
3.
It would result in a loss of revenue
Furthermore, Filipino resistance
to internal taxation especially to land tax is also address in this chapter.
There was also the attempt to enable landowners to obtain title to their real
estate in the agrarian policy but Filipinos did not respond eagerly to the
efforts of the Americans to give them the most valid proof of real estate due
to the whole novelty of the whole endeavor.
The
Filipinos and Free Trade
The Curtis Bill was introduced in January 1905, providing for a 75%
reduction on the Dingley Tariff on Philippine sugar and tobacco and for the
free entry of all other goods wholly in the Philippines. In the same year,
Congressman Sereno Payne, introduced another bill providing for similar
concessions as well as for reciprocal free trade after April 11, 1909, the expiration date of the provision of the
Treaty of Paris, granting Spanish products the same treatment as American goods
entering the Philippines. Neither of these house measures however, were
enacted.
The Payne Bill is important
because it made a substantial reduction of duties in Philippine sugar and
tobacco and the abolition of such duties at a later time.
On August 5, 1909, Payne-Aldrich
Tariff Act was enacted. This act regulated the trade relations between the
Philippines and the United States during the remainder of the American Regime. Its
provisions can be summarized as follows:
1.
All products and manufactures of the
United States, except rice, were free of duty to the Philippines
2.
All Philippine products shipped to the
United States under similar conditions, except rice, were to be admitted
duty-free, with the provision that
any amounts in excess of the following were to be charged the full tariff
rates:
a.
300,000 gross tons of sugar
b.
300,000 pounds of wrapper tobacco and
filler tobacco with more than 15% filler tobacco
c.
1,000,000 pounds of filler tobacco
d.
150,000,000 cigars
Thus, the Filipino elite opposed
the establishment of free trade relations, because “it would, in the long run,
be highly detrimental to the economic interests of the Filipino people,
powerful economic interests alone would benefit from free trade, and that large
companies from America might eventually control Philippine commerce, industry
and especially, agriculture.” In addition. The elite also argued that free
trade would delay the attainment of Philippine independence. It was asserted
that American companies in the Philippines reaping handsome profits from free
trade might apply pressure in the United States not to grant independence.
CHAPTER 8
THE FILIPINOS AND THE FUTURE
POLITICAL STATUS OF THE PHILIPPINES
The first Philippine political
party that was organized under the American rule is the Federal Party (Partido
Federal) that was officially established with Taft’s blessings and
encouragement on December 23, 1900. At the time of its organization, it
consisted of the so-called Autonomists, who
had endorsed the Hay Plan, proposed
by the Schurmann Commission in 1899, and of former officials of the Malolos
Republic.
The members of the Federal Party
were the wealthy and educated Filipinos whose original platform is to express
the aspiration of its founders that the Philippines will soon be admitted as
one of the states of the United States. Announcements of the three of the most
prominent members of Federal Party are also indicated in this chapter.
Next is the Nacionalista Party
which independence is its main platform. However, Taft convinced the
nationalists not to realize their plans as this expressed opposition to the
government and that law enforcement agencies might misconstrue the peaceful intentions
of the nationalists. Taft then advised the nationalists to focus on the
economic development of the country. Eventually there was a fusion of
Urgentistas and the Unionistas which became Union Nacionalista which in turn
merged with the Partido. This new party declared that its aim was “the
immediate independence of the Philippine Islands… under a democratic
government” (p.141). Progresistas whose platform is immediate independence is
also discussed in this chapter.
Seditious
Movements
A discussion of the Filipino
response to the Taft Regime's policy of the indefinite retention of the
Philippines will not be completed if it excludes the segment of the Filipino
endeavors to change that policy using force. These endeavors included the
Guerrilla movements by remnants of General Aguinaldo's Army and conspiracies by
hard core Nationalists. The Guerilla activities were basically the work of the
lower classes of the Filipino society. Then again, substantial individuals from
the high society were specifically included in a few conspiracies amid the
early years of the Taft Regime.
History
hasn’t been kind to the Filipinos who rebelled as they have simply been called ladrones (bandits,magnanakaw)and
opportunist-agitators masquerading as true nationalistas. Here are the
movements described as seditious:
1.
Sakay and the “Filipino Republic.”
Macario Sakay had been a member of the Katiounan, and of the army of the
Revolutionary Governement. He tried to revive the Katipunana in Manila and was
indicted under the Sedition Law.
2.
The Ricarte Movement. This developed
from the attempts of Gen. Artemio Ricarte and his lieutenants to incite people
to rebellion during the period 1903-1914. He was a former teacher of the
KAtipunan and later became one of its leaders. Upon his refusal to take the
oath of allegiance to the US, he was deported to Guam together with Mabini and
other “irreconcilables.”
3.
Some other associations and movements
during the Taft Regime are “Dimas-Alang” and “Makabuhay”. “Dimas-Alang” was
organized by Patricio Belen in 1910 as a sort of mutual aid society among
former Katipuneros, but its
membership included the majority of “hard-working people”.
CHAPTER 9
CONCLUSION
The Taft Regime was the first
phase of the encounter between the Philippine and American civilizations. In
this confrontation, the Filipino elites (the caciques, principalias and the
ilustrados) on the eve of American Regime, were the most important and single
beneficiaries. American policy was outlined through their reactions.
The Filipino reaction to the American
policy was most enthusiastic, and changes in institutions were greatest in
education and religion except in Muslim areas.
The
Filipinos also warmly welcomed the use of English
as the language of instruction in public schools, and as a medium of
communication. Religious freedom and separation of the state were also accepted
and only the Roman Catholics were bitter in this aspect.
Other
areas were however faced with resistance, such as the democracy in Philippine
governance, rooting to the fact that voting was only selective, as only 3% of
the entire population were made eligible to vote.
One
indelible imprint left by the Taft Regime was in the field of government: a modern civil service system that was
not only efficient and dedicated to public service thank anything like it in
the Philippine history.
American
influence was perhaps most weak in the economic and social aspects of
Philippine life, partly because of the absence of concrete American policy on
these aspects, partly from the opposition of the elites, and partly from the
conservatism of the people themselves, which in turn was due to their relative
isolation from the main currents of change.
Tax
structure was also slightly modernized (the only achievement worth to mention)
in the economic sphere.
The
Americans inaugurated their regime in the Philippines by destroying an
independent republic, and until 1906, they also destroyed the overt expression
of independence.
Though
the Americans didn’t officially endorse a policy of independence during the
Taft Regime, they nevertheless adopted a policy of extreme conciliation. Such
policy had a sobering effect on the sentiments of independence. By the end of
the Taft Regime, the Filipinos desired immediate independence, and the
autonomous and Filipinized government under the protection of the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for this comment. Your opinion counts!